![]() CPU-ZĬPU-Z is one of the best tools out there for general benchmarking. It determines the performance of your computer via fourth tests: Image Editing, H.264 Video Encoding, OpenCL, and Heavy Multitasking.įinally, if you upload the results of your PC, you can see where you rank among others who have done the same. ![]() RealBech performs real-world CPU benchmarking. Therefore, you can be sure of the RealBench's trustworthiness. RealBench is developed by Asus, or better yet, the team behind the Republic of Gamers (ROG) products and services, which are the most high-end player product series of ASUS and have a very good reputation among many overclockers. If you’re not pleased with the output, then chances are you should invest in new hardware. Please note that the higher the points, the stronger the performance of your computer. The test result will reflect the performance of rendering a frame using one or all CPU cores, which can reflect the CPU's performance well. When running tests, it tends to render an image, because images are usually rendered via the CPU. CinebenchĬinebench is a free test suite that evaluates your computer's hardware capabilities. Guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.Read More CPU Benchmark Programs 1. Native vector widths: char 1, short 1, int 1, long 1Ĭonfused about mailing lists and their use? Platform #1 name: NVIDIA CUDA, version: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 8.0.0 ![]() Preferred vector width: char 1, short 1, int 1, long 1 Native vector widths: char 32, short 16, int 8, long 4 Platform #0 name: Intel(R) OpenCL, version: OpenCL 2.0 LINUXĭevice #0 (0) name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz I just want to understand the difference here (and I'm a big fan of john). I wonder if I've made something wrong when compiling john with OpenCL that could explain the low 3.3x gain. I wonder if hashcat's H/s is the same thing as john's c/s. > OpenCL Platform #1: Intel(R) Corporation > nvmlDeviceSetPowerManagementLimit(): Insufficient Permissions > * Device #2: WARNING! Kernel exec timeout is not disabled, it might cause you errors of code CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES > hashcat (v3.40) starting in benchmark mode. On the other hand, hashcat got a very nice 8191.7 MH/s on the GPU: On one hand, I find it surprising that raw-sha1-opencl on GTX 1080 is only 3.3 times faster than raw-sha1 on 2.1 GHz Xeon (E5-2620 v4). > ptxas info : Used 28 registers, 16388 bytes smem, 400 bytes cmem, 28 bytes cmem 64 bytes stack frame, 0 bytes spill stores, 0 bytes spill loads ![]() > ptxas info : Function properties for sha1 > ptxas info : Compiling entry function 'sha1' for 'sm_61' john/run/john -test -format=raw-sha1-opencl I've made a simple bench comparing john and hashcat and I'm quite surprised by the results: I've compiled john on Ubuntu 16.x LTS, following doc/INSTALL-UBUNTU. Now I have a dedicated Linux PC with Nvidia Geforce GTX 1080. I've only used few times hashcat on a Windows PC with an old Radeon. Hash Suite - Windows password security audit tool. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |